<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentarer til: Sparetiltak DEL II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://retter.no/2010/02/23/sparetiltak-del-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://retter.no/2010/02/23/sparetiltak-del-ii/</link>
	<description>/børdjebai njus/</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Av: Tor Mikalsen</title>
		<link>http://retter.no/2010/02/23/sparetiltak-del-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Tor Mikalsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retter.no/?p=521#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Takk for en meget god idé og et ellers godt innlegg. Alonas prinsipp kombinert med din gjenbrukstenkning, burde kunne gjøre noe med holdningene rundt det å kjøpe. 

En blir nødt til å tenke nærmere over hvordan en kan resirkulere den gjenstanden en har hjemme, som nykjøpet gjør at en blir nødt til å skifte ut. Har andre bruk for det eller hvordan skal det gjenvinnes best mulig? 

Og den nye tingen man kjøper skal jo også resirkuleres en gang. Kanskje kan man allerede ved innkjøpet vurdere dennes gjenbruk eller gjenvinningsmuligheter. Hard plast går jo f.eks rett i restavfallet i våre dager. Det er null kretsløp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Takk for en meget god idé og et ellers godt innlegg. Alonas prinsipp kombinert med din gjenbrukstenkning, burde kunne gjøre noe med holdningene rundt det å kjøpe. </p>
<p>En blir nødt til å tenke nærmere over hvordan en kan resirkulere den gjenstanden en har hjemme, som nykjøpet gjør at en blir nødt til å skifte ut. Har andre bruk for det eller hvordan skal det gjenvinnes best mulig? </p>
<p>Og den nye tingen man kjøper skal jo også resirkuleres en gang. Kanskje kan man allerede ved innkjøpet vurdere dennes gjenbruk eller gjenvinningsmuligheter. Hard plast går jo f.eks rett i restavfallet i våre dager. Det er null kretsløp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Av: Jon Petter</title>
		<link>http://retter.no/2010/02/23/sparetiltak-del-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Petter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retter.no/?p=521#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Du vet han Greg, Cree first nations, han var kreativ i forrige uke da han resirkulerte Valentine's blomsterne han hadde gitt til kjæresten sin til noen andre et par dager etterpå, han plukket bare vekk de som hang litt med hodet. Det synes jeg var i overkant av miljøvennlighet i prakis :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Du vet han Greg, Cree first nations, han var kreativ i forrige uke da han resirkulerte Valentine&#8217;s blomsterne han hadde gitt til kjæresten sin til noen andre et par dager etterpå, han plukket bare vekk de som hang litt med hodet. Det synes jeg var i overkant av miljøvennlighet i prakis <img src='http://retter.no/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Av: Gunn-Britt</title>
		<link>http://retter.no/2010/02/23/sparetiltak-del-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunn-Britt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retter.no/?p=521#comment-157</guid>
		<description>Thanks Alonažan, for sharing this little story with the big message on the blog :-) See you, soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Alonažan, for sharing this little story with the big message on the blog <img src='http://retter.no/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> See you, soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Av: Alona</title>
		<link>http://retter.no/2010/02/23/sparetiltak-del-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Alona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retter.no/?p=521#comment-156</guid>
		<description>The nomad life of reindeer herder, his objective world and his relationship to the environment developed many centuries ago. This whole concept was always transferred from generation to generation. Even discovery of really valuable for those people products of technical civilization (hunting weapons, textiles, etc.) did not radically disrupt their basic principle of life: "only things you really need - and nothing more."
My grandmother, a great lover of beautiful things, once refused to accept a small, light in weight plastic table, which I bought for her to use in tundra where she lived all the year round, moving from one pasture to another. She liked it very much, but explained that if something happens to it, she cannot “hang” it on her dress. Then she brought her dress made of reindeer skin. It was beautifully decorated and produced different sensations on the eye: string of beads contained parts of the watch mechanism, perfume or medicine broken off glass necks were sewn into fabric together with the colorful buttons which were made before the October revolution, polished to a red shine, the copper bullets were attached to a sleeve and contained a needle and a thread. Surprisingly the dress itself was quite new. «Oh, yes,-my grandmother said- I just made it, but the whole decoration moved from the old dress to that one. Most of the beads belonged to my mother…». Who was also a good recycler.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nomad life of reindeer herder, his objective world and his relationship to the environment developed many centuries ago. This whole concept was always transferred from generation to generation. Even discovery of really valuable for those people products of technical civilization (hunting weapons, textiles, etc.) did not radically disrupt their basic principle of life: &#8220;only things you really need - and nothing more.&#8221;<br />
My grandmother, a great lover of beautiful things, once refused to accept a small, light in weight plastic table, which I bought for her to use in tundra where she lived all the year round, moving from one pasture to another. She liked it very much, but explained that if something happens to it, she cannot “hang” it on her dress. Then she brought her dress made of reindeer skin. It was beautifully decorated and produced different sensations on the eye: string of beads contained parts of the watch mechanism, perfume or medicine broken off glass necks were sewn into fabric together with the colorful buttons which were made before the October revolution, polished to a red shine, the copper bullets were attached to a sleeve and contained a needle and a thread. Surprisingly the dress itself was quite new. «Oh, yes,-my grandmother said- I just made it, but the whole decoration moved from the old dress to that one. Most of the beads belonged to my mother…». Who was also a good recycler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

